Define the falsifiable question
Translate the idea into state variables, observables, assumptions, and an outcome that can fail.
METHOD / REPRODUCIBILITY / CLAIM CONTROL
The purpose of a numerical study is not to obtain an attractive plot, but to construct a testable chain in which a favourable regime survives required controls and failure modes remain visible.
01 / EVIDENCE LADDER
Every study page states what type of result is presented and what it does not establish.
| Level | What it means | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | A proposed mechanism | No result yet |
| Numerical result | An observable from one calculation | Requires robustness checks |
| Simulation study | A documented series under one model | Bounded by equations and parameters |
| Numerical PoC | A linked chain of controls and stress tests | Supports a mechanism at model level |
| Laboratory validation | An independent physical experiment | Tests correspondence with reality |
| Experimentally confirmed result | A reproducible physical measurement | Not automatically industrial readiness |
02 / WORKFLOW
The exact tests change with the physics of the problem; the verification logic remains stable.
Translate the idea into state variables, observables, assumptions, and an outcome that can fail.
Choose equations, discretisation, boundaries, initial conditions, and diagnostics appropriate to the question.
Add passive, null, negative, ablation, conservation, and numerical-validity controls before interpreting a favourable branch.
Sweep parameters, seeds, perturbations, and resolutions; retain negative and failure results.
Separate model-level evidence from assumptions, artefacts, untested extrapolation, and laboratory claims.
Deliver reproducible methods, diagnostics, limitations, and an explicit laboratory or engineering follow-up.
03 / CONTROL SET
Not every project needs every item, but omissions must be justified.
Mass, energy, fluxes, constraints, and numerical error.
What happens without the claimed mechanism or controller.
A configuration expected to destroy the target effect.
Removal of a term, channel, or feedback pathway.
Dependence on a specific realisation.
Discretisation, resolution, and timestep dependence.
The range before degradation or collapse.
A coherent observable set rather than one convenient score.
What cannot be transferred to hardware without experiment.
STANDARD DISCLAIMER
This work is a numerical proof-of-concept. It establishes model-level behaviour under the stated assumptions and does not replace independent laboratory validation.