Research question
Which V2 claims can be closed under an explicit classical surrogate, which mechanisms survive controlled audit and replication, and which historical interpretations must be rejected or left open?
MODEL SCOPE
Public model description
V2R first records why the historical V2 equations do not define a unique executable model, then introduces a declared classical surrogate rather than treating a convenient closure as recovered physics. Its public observables cover completion, decoder response, carrier organisation, phase-key access, and opponent-indexed directional rejection.
PROTOCOL
Declared evidence chain
V2R.1–V2R.27R3 form the retained audit chain: closure and decoder controls, write–hold–probe completion, multi-template and open-set tests, cue and capacity stress, carrier/phase ablations, opponent-indexed rejection, robustness passes, and a final 14-seed exact-geometry replication. V2R.3 and V2R.12 are explicitly superseded rather than combined with the final evidence ledger.
Series: V2R.1–V2R.27R3 · claim-bounded closure audit · 14-seed exact-geometry replication
- V2R.1–V2R.27R3
- claim-bounded closure audit
- 14-seed exact-geometry replication
The labels below preserve the public protocol identity. They are an index to the publication, not a substitute for its full methods or an open reproducibility bundle.
EVIDENCE
Results inside the model
INTERACTIVE MODEL LENS
Closure-audit lens
A claim-bounded view of the declared surrogate, associative completion, and the carrier/phase mechanisms that survive or fail controlled transfer tests.
Write–hold–probe and open-set controls support completion only inside the declared finite test regime.
- The declared surrogate supports bounded associative completion, multi-template recognition with open-set rejection, finite cue-assisted stress survival, and a finite tested capacity window.
- Carrier reorganisation, a phase key, and opponent-indexed directional rejection survive the declared controls; exact-geometry same-role re-instantiation is reproduced across 14 seeds with median retention 1.027.
- The historical quartic localization claim is not supported in the tested regime, and the original 50.1% result cannot be interpreted as recovery because a 15% flip leaves the corrupted input at 85% accuracy.
BOUNDARY
CLAIM BOUNDARY
- 01Declared numerical protocol
V2R.1–V2R.27R3 · claim-bounded closure audit · 14-seed exact-geometry replication
- 02Supported model-level finding
The declared surrogate supports bounded associative completion, multi-template recognition with open-set rejection, finite cue-assisted stress survival, and a finite tested capacity window.
- Claim boundary
- 03Requires a separate validation chain
V2R does not recover the missing historical laws, validate a quantum or plasma substrate, establish geometry independence or a portable ρ/γ state packet, prove unrestricted capacity or scaling, or demonstrate advantage over established computation. Superseded V2R.3 and V2R.12 results are not carried forward.
Numerical evidence is not physical validation. Transfer to a material, device, organism, environment, or operational service requires a separate validation chain whenever such a transfer is relevant.
Publication record
- Author
- Nikita Teslia
- Programme
- Foundational systems
- Claim type
- Numerical evidence ledger
- Year
- 2026
- Dossier review
- Series
- V2R.1–V2R.27R3 · claim-bounded closure audit · 14-seed exact-geometry replication
- License
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.22055505
Citation
Teslia, N. (2026). V2R: Resonant Convergence in a Dynamically Coupled Phase Field Revisited. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22055505Open publication recordThe DOI is the canonical external record. The site condenses the public publication and does not replace it.
PROGRAMME TOPOLOGY
Research lineage
Lineage records publication sequence and explicit revision or supersession links. It does not assert empirical causation or an otherwise unverified cross-branch dependence.